Skip to content

Google Drawing for Timelines

May 15, 2016

With reading classes, I try to design activities that require the students to read and reread the text.  One way to encourage this type of interaction with the text is through having students do different kinds of illustration or diagramming activities.  One of the first activities that I did with my students this last semester was to make a timeline for a reading.  I have done this in the past using a spreadsheet, but I was looking at videos on YouTube for ideas and found one that showed how to put a timeline on top of an image.  I decided to do this with my students.

I made a video explaining how to make the timeline.

I took the students to the lab and worked with them on making the timeline.  The lesson went well in that the students could complete the timeline in the time we had for the class and most timelines were accurate.  If they were not, I gave students feedback and encouraged them to revise their timelines until they were correct.

It is important with Google Drawing that all of the students have a Google account preferably setup before class.

This activity can help prepare for later illustration and diagramming of reading texts for showing the relationships between main ideas and supports, for showing organizational patterns, and showing statements and evidence.  The advantage of using Google Drawing early with a lesson like this is we don’t have to provide as much guidance on how to use Google Drawing after the first lesson.  Thus, the students can spend more time with the reading.

Thoughts on Zipgrade

May 14, 2016

During the last semester, I tried out Zipgrade, an application for Android and Apple systems.  I put in on my iPad and iPhone to use in my reading class and ran a few trials with it.

Zipgrade as the name suggests is a tool for quickly grading students’ work.  It grades multiple choice activities quickly giving an almost immediate score and can show the correct and incorrect items.  Zipgrade functions using the device’s camera whether tablet or phone to take a picture and process the information.  In addition, the website where the information goes puts the information into analysis so the teacher can see quickly how well the students perform on each item as well as how well they perform on the test or quiz as a whole.

Let’s walk through the procedure for using the application.  The teacher creates a key for a quiz or an exam on his or her device.  If the students’ information has been uploaded to the teacher’s account on the website, the teacher can assign the quiz or test to a class.  The teacher prints out the proper answer sheet (there are three options: 1o items, 20 items, and 50 items) for the quiz.  The answer sheet is a scantron type form with multiple choice options for five answers.  The quiz is administered with the students blackening their choices for the answers.  When they finish, the teacher lets the app take a picture of the answer sheet and the score is processed.  The teacher can share the results immediately with the students.

I found that setting up a class made it very easy for me to get on with the quizzes, grading, and analysis.  I imported my class from a .csv file.  Students were assigned id numbers which makes it possible to use different types of answer sheets.  Since I had set up the class, I also could print out individualized answer sheets with the students’ names and id number on the print out.  This made grading with the application quick and easy for the most part.  I also had data available after the test for analysis which not only told me how my students did, but also the data helped me see item by item the troublesome items and the items the students had mastered.

It was a quick process when it worked.  However, I experienced some difficulties.  The application is finicky about reading the answer sheets because they have to be perfectly level.  Also, it took me a while at first to get my phone and tablet aligned properly to read the answer sheets.  The bothersome part was that after a few answer sheets were read, the application quit processing the answer sheets on my iPad.  I switched to my iPhone and finished.  I don’t know what would have happened if I had not had my phone with me.  I don’t know if the same problem would have arisen if I had begun with my phone.

Pricing is reasonable.  The first one hundred answer sheet readings are free.  They charge 1.99 USD for two months and 6.99 USD for one year.  There is also a Value Purchase Program for Education through Apple that costs 12.99 USD that appears to have no time limit.

I plan to use this application in my next semester and will prepare for it.  I found Zipgrade in the middle of the semester and just did some trial runs.  It is useful and makes grading much easier and quicker so I can concentrate on teaching and analysis instead of making checks on papers.  I like having the data available though the report includes a lot of information which I found superfluous, but I think there are ways in Google Sheets for me to manage it better in the future.

In summary, a quick grading tool that removes the drudgery and provides some very useful analysis to help improve my tests and my teaching.


cheating to collaboration

October 3, 2014

A few students in my communication class made the exact same errors on a listening test while others got items correct but made similar spelling errors.  My first reaction was to be upset that they were cheating and upset with myself being unable to catch them.  However, after thinking about it for a time, I decided to go along with what they were doing by allowing them to collaborate on the test today.

I told the classes (a morning and an afternoon class) about the amazing similarities in errors.  Heads went down, and there were a few embarrassed smiles.  Then I told them that I would like them to write on their papers whose help they got by looking at the paper or asking (unfortunately in the afternoon class, I wasn’t so specific about the looking on).  I also told the students I would give a student a 0 on the test if I thought they got help but did not write down the person’s name they got help from.

The results were that the morning class not only wrote their names down, but some wrote their names beside the items where they got help.  The afternoon class was less forthcoming about getting help and seemed to think I was trying to trick them despite my assurances that I would consider this collaboration.

Am I caving into cheating?  I suppose I am.  Will it matter in the long run? I don’t know.  I am not getting as much information about students with problems, but in another way I am since those with problems are relying on help.  Also, they don’t seem to collaborate on many items of the test.  I will continue to experiment with this.

Since I don’t want them cheating/collaborating on the final exam, I have decided the final will be given in shifts so that cheating will be more difficult.  I will split the class and give the test to one half then repeat the test for the second half.

Show Me Assessment

October 2, 2014

I have been trying out some ways to gain more information about how my reading students approach some of the skills we work on.  I began last spring with what I call a show me.  I was not trying to build off of the ShowMe app.  In fact, I doubt if any of my students were aware of the app.  The idea came to me from writing class where I keep telling my students that they need to show me not tell me.

My approach to the show me has been to have students make a PowerPoint, video, or other illustration showing me how they found, for example, the main idea or supporting details.  The challenge is not just to get the correct answer, but to show how they got their answers.  In return, I can understand better what they are doing.  One pair of students provided me with a PowerPoint deck that showed me a distorted sense of supporting information.  They only highlighted the details but left out the explanation part of the support.

They tend to favor PowerPoint, but I am going to work on finding other applications that will illustrate better.  I tried with educreations this time, but the interface confused the pair that tried it.  Next time, I will put together or find a tutorial for the suggested sites or apps.

Today, I gave the students an extra credit opportunity to explain the differences between 5 word pairs that they had difficulties with on the last vocabulary quiz.  Again, the goal is that they show me how they understand the problem.  The attempt is tentative, but I am looking for ways to follow through on this.

The main goal of a show me is somewhat like the math show me your work approach.  I want to find out how they understand what they are doing.

Note Taking Experiment

January 11, 2014

Last semester I tried to upgrade my note taking activities and actually work on note taking in a more systematic way. When I put together my original ebook for the communication class I teach, I gave overviews of some note taking strategies such as the Cornell System, outlining, mapping, and sentences. However, I didn’t do much in class. I simply assigned students to watch the assigned TED talk for the class and take notes. One page of notes can be used when I show the video in class and give the test on the video.

This approach was working well enough, but I wanted to do more and have struggled to find ways to make note taking engaging. Last semester I came up with an idea that is probably not original, but it does enable me to attempt to get students to be more analytical in taking notes. One problem students seem to have is with separating supporting details from main ideas. In other words, everything has the same importance. I want them to develop some skill in distinguishing these types of information. Also, I want them to get a sense of how a speaker shapes his or her discourse in a speech.

I took a few TED talks that I have been using and edited them to include just the initial few minutes of the talk. I labeled the parts of one of the edited talks with story (since the speaker used stories to begin and reinforce the main idea), main idea, supporting detail, and transition. Then I took a couple more talks, edited them down to about five minute and inserted numbers using the captioning in MovieMaker. I made a handout with the numbers and the choices of main, supporting detail, transition, and restatement. The students watch the video and circle the part of the speech they identify. This activity led to some discussion about identifying main ideas and details.

This semester I am going to push it a little further. I took a TED talk by Angela Lee Duckworth and devised a time line for the speech dividing it into 6 parts.

The speech is six minutes long and seems to break into 6 distinct parts. I plan to have the students first summarize the parts by stopping at the point where a new part begins. Next, I will show the video again and have them identify the elements such as main idea, supporting details, recommendation, reporting research results, and drawing conclusions. Finally, I plan to have them identify the clues that help them distinguish the different parts. If this works, i.e., if students seem to show that they can do at least many of the tasks with success, I will repeat this with a couple more similar activities during the semester. I hope that as I do it and with feedback from the students I can improve their learning experience with note taking.

Pop Quizzes – Teachers Policing

June 29, 2013



I was at a training today on how to use our new learning management system.  Our school has changed from ANGEL to Canvas.  Truly, they have enough differences that we can not go right in and get to work.  

During the session, one teacher spoke up saying she didn’t see that she had any need for a learning management system because she gave lots of pop quizzes to her classes to make sure they did their work.  I mentally took exception to this because I don’t like pop quizzes.  I also interpreted the tone of her voice as one of self righteousness.  So my reactions were colored by my attitudes toward this and my perceptions of the teacher’s tone which may be completely wrong.

However, it caused me to think about pop quizzes used as a policing tool, i.e., did the students study what I wanted them to study?  I have a policy of no, or seldom, using pop quizzes to avoid the punitive quality.  If I do give them, they are not usually for a grade.  When I do use them, I want to know where a problem exists.  Thus for me, a pop quiz should be another method of formative assessment in order to find out what needs to be worked on.   If I do use something like a pop quiz, I often have students complete the quiz, then compare and discuss their answers before reviewing it in class.

A pop quiz should not be used to determine whether or not the students did the reading or the homework.  After all what kind of message do we send when we give pop quizzes to determine whether or not the students did the homework?  

Some evidence exists that frequent quizzes support learning because they encourage retrieval, and completion items seem to work better then multiple choice.  Therefore, the use of quizzes can be productive when used appropriately, as a learning tool.

The Flipped Class: Evolution or Revolution?

June 9, 2013

I gave a plenary speech on the flipped class as evolution or revolution.  My argument is that for English Language Teachers the flipped class approach is an evolution in best practices for language teaching.   The emphasis of language pedagogy has consistently emphasized learner-centeredness.  If we look at the designer methods from the 80’s, the Silent Way, TPR, Community Language Learning, they emphasized the learner and often tried to get the teacher out of the way of the learning.  This focus on learners and giving the learners control over aspects of their learning has pushed English Language Teachers (ELTs) toward teaching approaches that differ much from traditional teacher-centered approaches.  

ELTs have focused on the learner pretty much from the start of their careers although we may have felt a tension between the teacher-centered and learner-centered approaches, or perhaps it is just me.  Most of us were taught in teacher-centered classes, and the teachers we have sought as role models may have been those types of teachers.  Adjusting to the learner-centered approach has required many adjustments in our mental models, but those adjustments (in my case continuing adjustments) seem more necessary at this time in which traditional teacher-centered approaches have been shown to be less effective with contemporary learners.

I think ELTs will find the flipped class model more of an evolutionary step in their growth as teachers.  It enables more time for teachers to work with individual and small groups.  Some teachers have found their ways to doing this without the flip.  For me, the flip has provided a way to do what I have always wanted but coult not figure out how to do.